Featured News 2019 When Do Courts Suppress Evidence?

When Do Courts Suppress Evidence?

When a person is facing criminal charges, there is sometimes a considerable amount of evidence that might prove their guilt. However, sometimes this evidence is not allowed to be used in court to incriminate the person standing trial. In specific instances, a court may decide to suppress evidence. These are the reasons why evidence might be suppressed during a criminal trial.

The Exclusionary Rule

The exclusionary rule is a guideline that prevents the government from using evidence that was gathered illegally. This rule is commonly invoked when a person’s right to protection from unwarranted searches and seizures is violated. For example, if a person is facing criminal charges because they were caught with drugs through an unwarranted search, then a court cannot use this evidence to incriminate the defendant. Because of the exclusionary rule, a person can only be convicted of a crime using evidence that was legally obtained.

Failure to Read Miranda Rights to a Suspect

Unwarranted search and seizures are one of the most common reasons for the suppression of evidence. However, evidence may also be suppressed if a police officer fails to inform a suspect of their Miranda Rights. Miranda Rights inform a suspect of their right to an attorney and their right to remain silent until they receive legal counsel.

Coercion

In some instances, a person’s confession to committing a crime might not be enough to convict them of the very crime they admit to doing. A confession might be deemed as inadmissible evidence if the court believes a defendant was coerced by prosecutors, police, or others to confess to the crime. The Innocence Project has reveled how important recognizing a forced confession is. The organization has found that many clients proven innocent by DNA testing confessed to a crime that they did not commit during their trial.

The organization found false confessions to occur because of:

· Real or perceived intimidation from law enforcement

· Use of force during interrogation

· The fear of or a perceived use of force during interrogation

· Compromised reasoning of a suspect due to exhaustion, stress, hunger, and other factors

· Interrogation techniques designed to mislead suspects

· Fear that failing to confess will make a punishment more severe

Chain of Custody Error

A chain of custody error occurs when evidence is not properly documented or stored. If there is not a clear chain of custody for evidence, it might lack the credibility needed to be used as evidence before a court. For example, blood samples must be handled with scientific precision. If a blood sample is not properly cared for, it may be suppressed as evidence. A famous example of the chain of custody causing evidence to be dismissed occurred during the OJ Simpson murder trial. A critical sample of blood was improperly stored and was not able to be used as evidence.

Related News:

What Not to Do While Under Arrest

If you are ever arrested, one thing you certainly cannot do is forget your rights. And the best course of action is usually to exercise your right to remain silent and your right to an attorney. Keep ...
Read More »

Keeping Government Secrets: A Serious Responsibility!

Ex-Navy SEAL Matt Bissonette was thrilled to share about a book that he recently helped write on CBS’ 60 Minutes. The former soldier says that he is one of the authors of “No Easy ...
Read More »

Supreme Court Rules Silence Can be Used as Evidence in Court

In an important case known as Salinas vs. Texas the United States Supreme Court decided that a suspect's silence can sometimes be used against them during police interviews that take place prior ...
Read More »